| yakbike9's Forum Info |
| Joined: |
11-24-2022 |
| Last Visit: |
(Hidden) |
| Total Posts: |
0 (0 posts per day | 0 percent of total posts)
(Find All Posts)
|
| Total Threads: |
0 (0 threads per day | 0 percent of total threads)
(Find All Threads)
|
| Time Spent Online: |
(Hidden) |
| Members Referred: |
0 |
| Reputation: |
0
[Details] |
|
|
| Additional Info About yakbike9 |
| Bio: |
TL;DR: Here’s the spreadsheet. Note that is a brief link while I work out some issues with the original document! It’s openly editable so please add your personal class(es)! Now read on for context! Update: An analysis of courses from this spreadsheet is on the market in a paper upcoming at SIGCSE 2020: What Will we Teach After we Teach Tech Ethics? In November 2017, a new York Times op-ed accused lecturers of being “asleep at the wheel” in relation to tech ethics. A flurry of response and dialog ensued, amassing many tweetstorms and counter-op-eds, together with this one from my collaborators on the PERVADE information ethics challenge. Tugging on totally different threads pulled the conversation in alternative ways - for example, lack of assets for much less-recognized disciplines such as STS or information research, or the truth that expertise critiques typically come from already marginalized voices. One of those threads centered on know-how ethics education, or relatively, as many random folks on Twitter tried to inform me, the lack of it.
https://www.folkd.com/submit/anotepad.com/notes/shycw5hg/ |
| Sex: |
Male |
|
